Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Newell's avatar

I've not seen it said better, Alan. Thank you. We've lost connection to each other, which being a sometime cynic, might have been planned. Regardless of the cause, isolation at every level of the society, and within groups and sub-groups, seems to have become the norm, the dividing lines seem to have hardened. To reverse that trend we will have to give up something; convenience, time, a bit more money, etc.; but to get something of far greater value in return. Thank you too, for the kind words.

Expand full comment
Halftrolling's avatar

Look i have some issues with this but i suck ass at long posts so i’m going to boil it down.

How big does a city actually need to be to work as you describe? When does the trade off of size and “efficiency” for everything else stop being worth it? How do you ensure the cities don’t just revert to intelligence and morality shredders? Could “large towns” do a “good enough” job at being cities without as many of the massive downsides?

I don’t think your post satisfyingly answers the above questions. I realize this topic is a very complex and nuanced one but nobody has time for that. From my perspective, big cities cons outweigh the pros.

Completely separate topic, but I wonder how much of the “efficiency gains over time” graph people like wheeling out when complaining about the 40 hour workweek and lack of pay increases is due to the gutting of social relationships to streamline everything. If so my abject hatred of globalism and internationalism only deepens.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts