If interested the book "And the Band Played On" is very informative. It's long, closely-written and very detailed. It was written by a homosexual who later died of AIDS and although he blames Reagan etc for not funding research and treatment he is, to his credit, very frank about the points the author makes. I remember one statistic along the lines of: the average homosexual in New York in the late 70s or 80s had over 70 partners per year. He also goes into detail about the reluctance of homosexuals to curb their habits and the selfishness of the man they believed was one of the first North American HIV patients: Gaetan Dugas
The propaganda never stops. Even now in the ads for the HIV drugs lesbians feature prominently, while they are the safest cohort for risk of HIV transmission. IV drug users are noticeably absent from these ads as well, though they are at highest risk.
When the AIDS “educators” forced their way into public schools in the 80s, they were well represented by lesbians who, as you note, were not in high risk groups. But it did give them the chance to push cunnilingus and dental dams to school kids.
I hadn't thought of that, spot on! Going back and trying to reinterpret some of the prior agendas is an interesting pastime. I remember how hard they fought to put "sex education" in the schools with the idea that it was all about early pregnancy and STD prevention. Within slightly more than one generation it turned into promoting false ideas about choosing your own sex, promoting homosexuality, promiscuity and also used it as a wedge to separate children and their parents.
We’re incredibly fucking lucky that the biology of HIV means widespread use of PreP is unlikely to breed a pan-resistant strain but we’re taking the chance that it might rather than just tell gay men to use condoms. Maybe we will yet manage to breed pan-resistant HIV and will be back to it being an incurable scourge.
When the epidemiologists first observed the San Fran bathhouse scene, they were shocked at the number of partners the gays had. When their dicks got hard, they put it in an asshole.
Just a slight correction. The guy who told the truth on the Fox panel is named Ned Ryun. Ned is a clear thinker who always tells the truth. Fun fact, he is the son of the great runner/miler, Jim Ryun.
Otherwise, you are preaching the truth. Another villain in this sad story is the American Church, even Big Eva. Once they decided that being "polite" to sodomites, the game was over. Because, if the church shirks its responsibility to be a brake on sinful cultural trends, there is no one left to make the moral case, not to mention the medical/scientific case.
Finally, if you want to see a real monster on this subject, look no further than Anthony Fauci. He as responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of gay men. RFK Jr. speaks about it in his book, "The Real Anthony Fauci..." And Fauci ran the exact same playbook during Covid. The man is the personification of evil.
It's not just a gay thing but a man thing. Men feel different to women. In general they feel safer and they take risks women don't. When it comes to sex they can't get knocked up. Women risk getting knocked up and also anything that happens to them happens to their eggs. They've got what's left of the eggs they were born with and that's it. It is a good reason for a generally less risky approach.
After that it's cultural and since you don't have a lot of support for gays in Christianity things like monogamy are not celebrated. There's also a bit of spite in promiscuity. You sometimes hear people say they had sex because they didn't want so-and-so to be the last person they had sex with. Heaven forbid that person feel important. I've also noticed that very often there's a need to match and one-up, sure you slept with all those people but you didn't marry them so they're not important. If you married the last one then you'll marry this one but this one you'll have a kid so that's how other people know it's important. If it's a man and he has kids with his ex you gotta match that at least and have an extra for good measure. But that's off topic. Gay men will have numerous partners in one night at a club and that's a fact.
I would also like to point out the suppressed truth that the majority of gay men were sodomized as boys by adult gay men, and this is why they are gay now. Homo-pedophilia is how male homosexuality reproduces itself:
Oh get fucked you clearly haven’t researched what was done. They pooled the blood products of fucking prisoners and didn’t treat it! It’s got FUCK all to do with gay people. Fucking lying toe rag piece of shit.
Well written post, Alan. I remember the first time aids came into public view. An article in time identified “patient zero”, a homosexual French flight attendant working the Paris to New York shift. In it Time described the man’s illness, diagnosis, and why he was considered “patient zero”. It seems his frequent patronizing of the NY and Paris bath houses had produced about 500 different sex partners…per year for the last 3 years. So, yeah, gay men spread this scourge and they couldn’t give a shit.
Also, the UCLA medical researchers who eventually became the first to identify the aids virus as the root cause of all the attendant illness in the afflicted group referred to this mystery disease as “the gay flu” because nearly every one of their subjects was a homosexual man. But…let’s not discuss any of that because love is love, or some similar bullshit.
My aunt knew a hemophiliac who died of aids. It caused his wife to lose her hair in grief and fear that she had it too, although she ended up being ok. Still though.
I always found the "if its in the bedroom only then it doesn't harm anyone else" argument both a starting point of the slippery slope we still slide down and an actual lack of understanding that everything we do affects other people around us, since humans are social creatures. There is no such thing as a victimless crime if you expect the society to pick up the tab for your mistakes - you are suddenly becoming a burden on those people who never had any input in your misdeed.
Two of the most insightful (and the most shocking) things I've ever read on the topic of promiscuous male homosexuality were the following; the first a Medical Study documenting the physical harms and decreased lifespan that result from the lifestyle, and the second (which was horrifying, but so well-written) was a harrowing article direct from the trenches through the eyes of someone who lived it.
It is ludicrous that no one would ever refute that the life of a female prostitute carries extreme risk to both health, and to safety. Yet in our rush to express our virtue-signalling "empathy/tolerance/solidarity" with gay men, so our friends don't call us names, we actually deny them the same right of consideration and concern. The very opposite of what we THINK we're achieving.
If interested the book "And the Band Played On" is very informative. It's long, closely-written and very detailed. It was written by a homosexual who later died of AIDS and although he blames Reagan etc for not funding research and treatment he is, to his credit, very frank about the points the author makes. I remember one statistic along the lines of: the average homosexual in New York in the late 70s or 80s had over 70 partners per year. He also goes into detail about the reluctance of homosexuals to curb their habits and the selfishness of the man they believed was one of the first North American HIV patients: Gaetan Dugas
The propaganda never stops. Even now in the ads for the HIV drugs lesbians feature prominently, while they are the safest cohort for risk of HIV transmission. IV drug users are noticeably absent from these ads as well, though they are at highest risk.
On the rare times I watch network TV or read a mainstream magazine, whenever I see their ads it makes me feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
they're more than happy to sell you those crazy pills
When the AIDS “educators” forced their way into public schools in the 80s, they were well represented by lesbians who, as you note, were not in high risk groups. But it did give them the chance to push cunnilingus and dental dams to school kids.
I hadn't thought of that, spot on! Going back and trying to reinterpret some of the prior agendas is an interesting pastime. I remember how hard they fought to put "sex education" in the schools with the idea that it was all about early pregnancy and STD prevention. Within slightly more than one generation it turned into promoting false ideas about choosing your own sex, promoting homosexuality, promiscuity and also used it as a wedge to separate children and their parents.
We’re incredibly fucking lucky that the biology of HIV means widespread use of PreP is unlikely to breed a pan-resistant strain but we’re taking the chance that it might rather than just tell gay men to use condoms. Maybe we will yet manage to breed pan-resistant HIV and will be back to it being an incurable scourge.
When the epidemiologists first observed the San Fran bathhouse scene, they were shocked at the number of partners the gays had. When their dicks got hard, they put it in an asshole.
FaggaChad Gaetan Dugas was running around one-shotting sodomites for a decade. The Bathhouse Nemesis.
Yes, his attitude was "someone gave it to me so why shouldn't I give it to someone else?"
Just a slight correction. The guy who told the truth on the Fox panel is named Ned Ryun. Ned is a clear thinker who always tells the truth. Fun fact, he is the son of the great runner/miler, Jim Ryun.
Otherwise, you are preaching the truth. Another villain in this sad story is the American Church, even Big Eva. Once they decided that being "polite" to sodomites, the game was over. Because, if the church shirks its responsibility to be a brake on sinful cultural trends, there is no one left to make the moral case, not to mention the medical/scientific case.
Finally, if you want to see a real monster on this subject, look no further than Anthony Fauci. He as responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of gay men. RFK Jr. speaks about it in his book, "The Real Anthony Fauci..." And Fauci ran the exact same playbook during Covid. The man is the personification of evil.
It's not just a gay thing but a man thing. Men feel different to women. In general they feel safer and they take risks women don't. When it comes to sex they can't get knocked up. Women risk getting knocked up and also anything that happens to them happens to their eggs. They've got what's left of the eggs they were born with and that's it. It is a good reason for a generally less risky approach.
After that it's cultural and since you don't have a lot of support for gays in Christianity things like monogamy are not celebrated. There's also a bit of spite in promiscuity. You sometimes hear people say they had sex because they didn't want so-and-so to be the last person they had sex with. Heaven forbid that person feel important. I've also noticed that very often there's a need to match and one-up, sure you slept with all those people but you didn't marry them so they're not important. If you married the last one then you'll marry this one but this one you'll have a kid so that's how other people know it's important. If it's a man and he has kids with his ex you gotta match that at least and have an extra for good measure. But that's off topic. Gay men will have numerous partners in one night at a club and that's a fact.
Thank you for telling the truth.
I would also like to point out the suppressed truth that the majority of gay men were sodomized as boys by adult gay men, and this is why they are gay now. Homo-pedophilia is how male homosexuality reproduces itself:
https://patrick.net/post/1343652/2022-02-13-the-gay-flag-is-also-the-symbol-of
They also killed Isaac Asimov.
This problem won't be mitigated until our society collapses and the health care systems propped up by it fail as well.
Oh get fucked you clearly haven’t researched what was done. They pooled the blood products of fucking prisoners and didn’t treat it! It’s got FUCK all to do with gay people. Fucking lying toe rag piece of shit.
Well written post, Alan. I remember the first time aids came into public view. An article in time identified “patient zero”, a homosexual French flight attendant working the Paris to New York shift. In it Time described the man’s illness, diagnosis, and why he was considered “patient zero”. It seems his frequent patronizing of the NY and Paris bath houses had produced about 500 different sex partners…per year for the last 3 years. So, yeah, gay men spread this scourge and they couldn’t give a shit.
Also, the UCLA medical researchers who eventually became the first to identify the aids virus as the root cause of all the attendant illness in the afflicted group referred to this mystery disease as “the gay flu” because nearly every one of their subjects was a homosexual man. But…let’s not discuss any of that because love is love, or some similar bullshit.
My aunt knew a hemophiliac who died of aids. It caused his wife to lose her hair in grief and fear that she had it too, although she ended up being ok. Still though.
I always found the "if its in the bedroom only then it doesn't harm anyone else" argument both a starting point of the slippery slope we still slide down and an actual lack of understanding that everything we do affects other people around us, since humans are social creatures. There is no such thing as a victimless crime if you expect the society to pick up the tab for your mistakes - you are suddenly becoming a burden on those people who never had any input in your misdeed.
Two of the most insightful (and the most shocking) things I've ever read on the topic of promiscuous male homosexuality were the following; the first a Medical Study documenting the physical harms and decreased lifespan that result from the lifestyle, and the second (which was horrifying, but so well-written) was a harrowing article direct from the trenches through the eyes of someone who lived it.
It is ludicrous that no one would ever refute that the life of a female prostitute carries extreme risk to both health, and to safety. Yet in our rush to express our virtue-signalling "empathy/tolerance/solidarity" with gay men, so our friends don't call us names, we actually deny them the same right of consideration and concern. The very opposite of what we THINK we're achieving.
Medical Consequences of Male Homosexuality:
https://archive.is/fxe3a
Article by Joseph Sciambra - “Surviving Gay…barely”
https://josephsciambra.com/surviving-gaybarely/